Optimizing row spacing and seed placement for high yield potential in winter wheat

Optimized planting decisions such as narrow rows and adaptation of other factors can help to maximize winter wheat yields.

Plots of winter wheat planting at 5-, 7.5-, 10- and 15-inch row spacing.
Winter wheat planted in different row spacings. From left to right: 5-, 7.5-, 10- and 15-inch row spacing. Photo by Wallas Mendes da Silva, MSU.

To maximize winter wheat yields, crop canopy architecture should be designed to optimize light interception and its conversion efficiency to biomass and finally grains. This can be achieved by optimizing planting decisions such as row spacing, seed placement, varietal canopy architecture and seeding rates. Previous research conducted in Michigan (Figure 1) has evaluated practices like combining the use of precision planting with narrow row spacing (5 inches) and their impact on winter wheat yield. Small-plot trials demonstrated a yield advantage ranging from 2.4% to 25.8% across four site years, shedding light on the benefits of narrow row spacing combined with the use of precision planting equipment.

Scatter plot showing corn yield (bushels per acre at 13.5% moisture) versus row spacing (inches) from 4 to 16 inches, labeled “Campus and SVREC.” Data points show yield decreasing with wider row spacing. A quadratic trendline is plotted with the equation y = 0.1207x² – 4.8864x + 131.55 and R² = 0.2994. Yields range from about 60 to 160 bu/acre, with higher yields at narrower row spacing.
Figure 1. Winter wheat yield as influenced by row spacing over two years (2018-2019) and two locations in Michigan (East Lansing, Richville), conducted by the Michigan State University Cropping Systems Agronomy lab.

To further assess these benefits and the performance of other alternative planting methods, recently concluded research compared wheat planted at field scale using commercial Michigan farms. Results showed an 8-33% yield increase in precision planting (in 5-inch row spacing) compared to conventional drill or air seeder (ranging from 5- to 7.5-inch row spacing) at four out of eight site-years (Figure 2). Other four site-years also showed numerically higher yield using 5-inch precision planter.

Bar chart comparing corn yield (bushels per acre) by planting method (Precision Planter, Air Seeder, Drill) across multiple site-years: Huron 2021, Genesee 2021, Ingham 2022, Huron 2023, and “Other site-years.” Yields generally highest with Precision Planter, intermediate with Air Seeder, and lowest with Drill. Significant differences are marked with letters above bars (a, b, c). Yields range from about 80 to 160 bu/acre, with Precision Planter consistently producing the highest yields in most site-years.
Figure 2. Winter wheat yield results from a planting methods study conducted by the Cropping Systems Agronomy lab at eight on-farm sites comparing the performance of precision planter in narrow rows (5 inches) with conventional drill or air seeders (mostly 7.5-inch row spacing). Other site-years are data pooled from four locations where no significant differences were found.

Both studies have shown clear evidence that wheat is responsive to the combination of narrow rows and adopting precision planting equipment. Precision planters have become standard equipment for planting row crops such as corn and soybeans due to their ability to provide uniform depth, singulation and precise metering of the seeds. However, conventional grain drills remain common on many farms, technology that has not been changed or updated in years, alongside the same standard 7.5-inch row spacing.

As growers face increasing pressure to improve yields while managing input costs to remain profitable, planting strategies such as narrow row spacing offer a complementary approach. By optimizing both input use and row configuration, Michigan farms can enhance yield potential and overall profitability. Data from previous studies conducted a few decades ago using a seed drill also showed a pattern similar to Figure 1, leading us to hypothesize that narrow row spacing might be the driving factor here and a good starting point for growers.

Our ongoing work is evaluating how other decisions, such as varietal canopy selection, weed control, fertility, etc., might need to be changed in a narrow-row wheat production system. The overall goal is to use sound agronomic principles in setting growers up for high wheat yields that are profitable and sustainable.

Recent results using a new custom-built precision planter have shown similar trends as shown above. Two years of research conducted at the Kellogg Biological Station in Hickory Corners, Michigan, and in East Lansing, Michigan, during 2024 and 2025 showed that 5-inch rows—achieved with a precision planter—consistently improved yield (6%, 6.6 bushels per acre) compared to the 7.5-inch rows (using seed drill) across varieties of differing canopy types (Figure 3).

Additionally, yield declined when using 10-inch (2.7%, 3.2 bushels per acre) and 15-inch (12.8%, 14.4 bushels per acre) row spacing compared to the 7.5-inch rows. We have recently purchased a narrow-row seed drill and will compare these systems to separate out the impacts of narrow rows from those of precise seed placement.

Bar chart comparing corn yield (bushels per acre) across row spacings (5", 7.5" drill, 10", 15", 15" drill) at three site-years: East Lansing 2025 (blue), Hickory Corners 2025 (orange), and Hickory Corners 2024 (green). Yields are highest at narrower spacings, particularly 5" and 7.5" drill in East Lansing 2025, and decrease with wider spacings. Letters above bars (a, ab, b, bc, c, d) indicate statistical significance. Yields range from about 85 to 140 bu/acre, with East Lansing 2025 consistently higher than Hickory Corners.
Figure 3. Winter wheat yield as influenced by row spacing over two years (2024-2025) at two locations in Michigan (East Lansing, Hickory Corners) conducted by the Michigan State University Cropping Systems Agronomy lab.

Along with the previously mentioned yield benefits of narrow rows and precision planting, this system allows us to achieve a more uniform spatial distribution around each plant (Figure 4). By reducing the spacing between rows, we can increase the spacing between plants within the row at a given seeding rate. A decrease in seeding rate for timely planted wheat can further increase spacing between plants. This extra intra-row space between plants has been associated with an increase in the number of tillers and is more likely a result of improved uniformity in seed placement and associated uniform tiller development, leading to an increase in kernels per head or kernel weight.

Diagram showing seed placement patterns at different row spacings and planting speeds. The first panel shows 7.5-inch spacing at 1.6 m/s with seeds placed closely, averaging 0.5 inches per seed. The second panel shows 5-inch spacing at 1.6 m/s with even, denser spacing of 0.8 inches per seed. The third panel shows 7.5-inch spacing at 1.2 m/s with seeds moderately spaced at 0.7 inches per seed. The fourth panel shows 5-inch spacing at 1.0 m/s with the widest spacing of 1.3 inches per seed. Dotted and dashed horizontal lines represent rows, with seed positions marked along them to illustrate distribution differences by equipment setting.
Figure 4. Differences in seed distribution achieved by a precision planter with 5-inch row spacing, and a traditional grain drill with 7.5-inch spacing, in high (1.6 million seeds per acre) and optimal seeding rates for each equipment shown for comparison. Intra-row spacing between seeds is also shown for each scenario.

Overall, these results provide practical recommendations for wheat growers regarding row spacing and seeding rate recommendations for improved yield potential. Currently, the marketplace offers a few options for narrow-row grain drills that growers can use. However, these options are limited, and growers might want to think about customizing their current systems to achieve narrow rows across multiple crops. By adopting a system approach using narrow row spacing and precision planting, and the right selection of other factors, growers can make more informed decisions that can improve wheat yields.

Michigan State University Extension will continue to update results from our ongoing research in helping growers develop a systems approach to narrow-row wheat production.

Did you find this article useful?